| Scoliosis – the word itself
connotes a morbid sense of deformity and finality. The twisted
frame, the unsightly humps – reminiscent of Quasimoto, the
Hunch-Back of Notre Dame. Throughout antiquity, this distortion
of the human body has stigmatized and brought suffering to its
victims, and challenged the acumen of legions of skilled –
and unskilled – practitioners of all stripes. It appears
to develop mysteriously, predominantly in pubescent females, and
often results in progressive deformity as well as pain and visceral
compromise throughout life.
In my 24-year career I have encountered a number of individuals
with this condition and have valiantly sought to ease their pain,
as we all have. I was never so bold as to assume that I could
alter the essential pattern of accentuated curvatures and vertebral
deformation reminiscent of this spinal condition, however I tried
to release some of the profound tension in the spinal muscles
associated with it. It seemed that all my efforts, no matter how
much sweat poured from my brow, were casually rebuffed by this
tenacious and relentless condition.
Over the course of my determined study to understand the underlying
patterns of human biomechanical dysfunction, I have uncovered
certain truths, which have proven themselves to me. In recent
years I have found, what I believe to be a process of determining
primary sources of tension, wherever they may be found in the
body – joints, muscles, bone, fascia, meninges, viscera
– and a method of releasing these disturbances at the molecular
level. This is the essence of what I refer to as Matrix Repatterning.
Matrix Repatterning is an objective, biomechanical method of
determining the primary sources of restriction within any of the
tissues of the body. This is determined by a comparison of tissue
resistance – literally tissue play – from one part
of the body to another. I have found that secondary areas of apparent
resistance – often the site of pain, for example –
will literally melt away when the area of primary restriction
is challenged, wherever it may be in the body.
The Matrix
This phenomenon is explained by a recently discovered unifying
model of organic tissue, referred to as the Tensegrity Matrix.
The term tensegrity was originally coined by Buckminster Fuller
to describe the interlinked truss systems he developed in the
field of architecture (e.g. the geodesic dome). This has now been
applied to organic tissue, since it has been shown that it is
composed of a similar matrix. The fact that pressure or tension
in one area of the body creates a pattern of strain throughout
the entire organism – instantaneously – is now supported
by hard scientific evidence.
The Tensegrity Matrix model of the body, composed of interconnected
tension icosohedra (see Figure 1a, below), was first postulated
by Stephen Levin, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon, to explain the
unusual properties of tissues that he observed in clinical practice.
Donald Ingber, M.D., Ph.D., a Harvard researcher, has provided
the hard scientific proof of the existence of this structure.
"The principles of tensegrity apply at essentially
every detectable size scale in the human body. At the macroscopic
level, the 206 bones that constitute our skeleton are pulled up
against the force of gravity and stabilized in a vertical form
by the pull of tensile muscles, tendons and ligaments. In other
words, in the complex tensegrity structure inside every one of
us, bones are the compression struts, and muscles, tendons and
ligaments [and all, interconnected internal fascial structures]
are the tension-bearing members.”
- Donald Ingber, from “The Architecture
of Life”,
Scientific American, January 1998.
When an area of the body is strained or impacted, the tensegrity
matrix responds at the molecular level by shifting electrons to
a higher valence, thereby creating a rigid structural pattern.
This molecular lesion translates into the tissue restrictions
we observe clinically. No amount of pulling, stretching, prodding,
snapping, surgery or medication is going to reverse this –
unless, by some fortunate accident the practitioner happens upon
the primary site of the molecular response – and then proceeds
to apply the precise force required to release abnormal state.
Intramolecular forces, as we know, are enormous, and resist forceful
attempts to disrupt them. This is one of the reasons I believe
that most therapies have only short-lived effects, since, in essence,
the tissues naturally resist the imposed forces attempting to
restore their normal length and resiliency.
Matrix Repatterning addresses this molecular
response head on. The assessment determines the sources
of restriction with pinpoint accuracy. The objectivity of
this process has proven itself many times by surveys of
inter-tester correspondence, which approach the range of
80% to 90% unheard of in my experience with any other
therapeutic system. Treatment involves extremely gentle
pressure on the target tissue. The goal is to induce a peizo-electric
effect to drop the excited state of the molecule back down
to its lower state of energy and its inherently balanced
tonal state. This has the effect of restoring normal tone
and shape to the tissues almost instantly and permanently!
(See Figures 1a and 1b) |

Figures 1a & 1b
(click picture to enlarge) |
Part of what has been remarkable in my discoveries with Matrix
Repatterning, is how it has opened my mind to the possibilities
of how injury actually effects tissue. I read an article when
I was a chiropractic student, some 26 years ago. The report described
a study involving the use of pigs in simulated automobile collisions.
These animals were subsequently assessed for any and all tissue
injuries. The primary effect on the test subjects to impact trauma
was tearing of the pericardium! For some reason, this information
stuck with me. I had no idea how profound its implications would
become for me in future years.
What I have come to understand about injury is how it transmits
force throughout the entire tensegrity matrix. This structure
is like one continuous piece of fabric and any force is instantly
felt throughout its entire length. Injury forces are translated
into kinetic energy, which is transferred from atom to atom and
from molecule to molecule. In the body, the tensegrity matrix
encounters certain other substances and structures, which can
alter the effects of these forces. It is a simple physical property
of matter which determines that the more dense a material, the
more its molecules will respond energetically to
the effects of mechanical deformation and force. The most dense
material in the body is water. The second most dense material
is bone. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that the areas
in the body that react most vigorously to impact trauma are the
structures which contain the greatest amount of water or the densest
and heaviest bones.
Therefore, the most common areas of primary restriction
tend to lie in the region of the fascia surrounding the
large, dense visceral structures namely the heart,
liver, spleen, kidneys and the cranium, which is largely
a water-filled vessel as well as the large, heavy
bones of the lower limbs and pelvis. A common example of
this effect is the relatively high incidence of rupture
of the spleen in motor vehicle collisions. The spleen goes
through daily cycles of engorgement and disgorgement as
it is filled and emptied of blood, depending on the bodys
requirements. Running with an engorged spleen will immediately
make itself know by the painful stitch under the left lower
costal margin. If the spleen happens to be full of blood
during the moment of a collision, then it is likely to rupture,
since it is a thin-walled structure. Other organs containing
large quantities of fluid (heart, liver, kidneys) tend to
be more protected by surrounding structures or have thicker
investing layers of tissue. Bone is a dense yet highly plastic
structure, which deforms in response to injury. Careful
measurements taken before and after treatment confirm that
many bony deformities can be instantly normalized using
Matrix Repatterning.
The primary sources of tension residing in these areas
of dense molecular reaction draw the entire body into a
state of imbalance tension resulting in strain patterns
such as the ones illustrated below. (See Figure 2)
The spine, as well as other structures, must accommodate
to the source of restriction due to the interlinked nature
of the tensegrity matrix. It is my theory that scoliosis
may simply be one extreme manifestation of this accommodative
process. In the diagram below one may see how competing
forces arising from two separate primary lesions (#1 from
the kidney and #2 from the ilium) may produce a typical
scoliosis pattern. (See Figure 3). |

Figure 2
(click picture to enlarge)

Figure 3
(click picture to enlarge) |
Correcting Scoliosis by Accident!
When I first encountered an individual with significant scoliosis,
since having discovered some of these basic principles, I had
no intention of performing any miracles. A 32-year-old, Caucasian
mother of three children, presented herself with complaints of
low back, hip and neck pain. She also had a previously diagnosed
40° right lateral curvature of the mid-thoracic spine and
a compensatory lumbar curvature, resulting in the typical S-shaped
deformity.
On the first visit I performed my usual assessment and proceeded
to treat her for the primary areas of dysfunction. This involved
the correction of tension patterns in the right kidney, the Glissons
capsule of the liver, the left pelvis and femur (articular and
intraosseous within bone lesions). Her range of
motion improved immediately and she reported less pain with motion.
I then asked her to lie down on the table, so that I could recheck
her for further areas of involvement. As she lay down on the table,
she exclaimed, What did you do to me? Well, you can
imagine what went through my mind. I hadnt done anything
traumatic, but it flashed in my mind, momentarily, that she had
suddenly lost all sensation in her legs!
Feigning calm confidence, I reluctantly inquired as to the nature
of her exclamation. She responded, I have never been able
to lie flat on a table before. What did you do? I inquired
further into how she felt. Did she have any pain? She reported
that she did not. I proceeded to have her stand up, and much to
my amazement, her previously obvious spinal deformity was now
non-existent!
I was both shocked and delighted! I had encountered some remarkable
results using Matrix Repatterning, however, I had not seen such
an extreme case of spinal deformity – apparently structural
in nature – disappear, literally before my eyes. I followed
her case for some time after this, following up with some minor
fine-tuning. To date, one year later, she has not had any noticeable
return of her scoliosis. Currently, I am trying to persuade her
to have some follow-up radiographs to confirm the change in her
condition. She is however, reluctant due to having received so
many X-rays as a child when the condition was first diagnosed.
Correcting Scoliosis – On Purpose!
A second case of scoliosis presented itself at, of all places,
a seminar that I was teaching in the spring of the following year.
A chiropractor, a 42-year-old Caucasian female, mentioned that
she had been helped by Matrix Repatterning (however, she felt
that she could not be totally well, since she had a significant
scoliosis. I was feeling rather bold that day – or perhaps,
foolhardy. I decided to gather the class together – it was
an advanced level seminar, so they were hopefully a friendly group,
with whom I had already established a certain level of credibility.
I then proceeded to assess the women’s curvature and her
patterns of restriction. Treatment was rendered and the whole
process took no longer than ten minutes. When she was asked to
stand up, we reassessed her and found that her scoliosis was largely
gone. On follow-up by phone, the subject reported that the curvature
had remained stable one month later. Three months post-treatment
there was some degree of recidivism, however, no follow-up treatment
had been rendered, and being an active individual, it is possible
that some re-injury had occurred in the interim. Several other
cases have been followed, with mixed results and I am pursuing
further study in this area.
Conclusions:
Scoliosis may be the result of falls and other impact trauma
incurred during adolescence – the individuals I have encountered
admitted to being tomboys in that phase of their lives. These
largely undetected effects of injury could, in theory, lead to
the type of spinal deformity known collectively as scoliosis.
Based on some limited experience with this condition, I believe
that there is some real hope that this, and many other structural
conditions, may be resolvable. Recent evidence suggests that certain
patterns of tension may be attributable to emotional issues during
puberty.
Matrix Repatterning represents a significant breakthrough in
our understanding of the body and its response to injury. In my
opinion, it validates much, which has been successful in the field
of structural medicine, while at the same time, explaining why
we may not be as successful in certain cases. I believe this new
understanding of the underlying structure of tissue and its response
to injury and therapy, at the molecular level, opens up new horizons
to overcoming the many conditions and much of the pain that we
encounter in our practices.
References:
Ingber, DE, The Architecture of Life, Scientific American, January,
1998.
Levin, SM, The Importance of Soft Tissues for Structural Support
of the Body, In: Positional Release Therapy: Assessment &
Treatment of Musculoskeletal Dysfunction by D’Ambrogio,
KJ and Roth, GB, Mosby-Harcourt, 1997.
Roth, GB, and D’Ambrogio, KJ, Positional Release Therapy:
Assessment & Treatment of Musculoskeletal Dysfunction, Mosby-Harcourt,
1997.
Dr. George Roth, D.C., N.D. is a practitioner
with over 25 years experience in the field of energy medicine.
He has developed a number of leading-edge technologies to assist
individuals in the achievement of optimal wellness. He lectures
extensively to various groups and educational institutions and
is a published author.
For more information, or to make an appointment, please contact
Dr. George B. Roth,
The Matrix Wellness Centre,
67 Prospect St., Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L4G 1R1
Phone: 905 836-WELL (9355)
1-877-905-7684
Fax: 905 726-8575
Email: info@matrixrepatterning.com
Web site: www.MatrixRepatterning.com
Back to Articles &
Research
Back to Top |